
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Da Parrot-chick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Alex Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > > > > >I think it's a good idea, ain't it? > > > > No, it's idiotic and unecessary. Any law that targets a specific type of > > vehicle is probably a stupid law. The law should be very general so tha > if > > some new type of vehicle comes out, new laws don't have to be written. If > > you want to tax gas, tax gas. Those that use more, will pay more. Pretty > > simple. Calling it an SUV is plain stupid. > > ----------------- > > Alex __O > > _-\<,_ > > (_)/ (_) > > In principal I agree with you, Alex, but there's an exception: the luxury > tax on RVs and high-end cars like Maserati, Ferrari, Bentley, and > Rolls-Royce. All cars are basically transportation appliances that use > petroleum-fueled internal combustion engines, but there's a difference (not > just price) between a $14,000 Geo Metro and a $350,000 Rolls-Royce Silver > Shadow. I don't have a problem with levying a luxury tax on the sale of > those vehicles and would gladly pay it if I were to purchase one. I would gladly pay a tax on my vehicle if it costed me $350,000.. but i only paid $23,000 for my truck and that doesnt mean i deserve to pay any special tax besides the usual taxes. DJ TecThreat
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |