
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"robpar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:33:38 -0600, Erica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (robpar) wrote: > > > >> On 1 Dec 2003 15:10:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erica) wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> >The fact that I did so through excessive sarcasm is my bad. I just got > >> >slightly steamed, is all. But robparr's tone didn't warrent it, so I'm > >> >sorry. > >> > > >> I tend to be very sarcastic when flaming a so called Pro-Lifer. Which you > >> appeared to be with the religious bigots. In using their lies about a near > >> full > >> term abortion. Which is only used when there is no hope of saving the baby, > >> and > >> the mothers life is at stake. > > > >I'm personally pro-life for my own choice, but pro-choice otherwise, if > >that makes sense. > > Makes perfect sense, I share that position, and it is the most widely accepted > position among the Pro-Choice. > > > I am also woefully underinformed on the subject and > >reacting on pure emotion (not that this ever stopped anyone on usenet > >from jumping right into a discussion, mind you). No lies, just reacting > >very subjectively on less than adequate data. > > > >Thank you for your first hand information. You are indeed operating from > >a position that is better informed than mine. I will therefore bow out > >of the discussion and toddle over to google to do a bit of research. > > > >Cheers > > > >Erica > Hang around, but try to avoid making anything personal. These > pro-lofe/pro-choice debates can become very heated. > However the current Pro-lifers posting here are rather lame.Maybe some of the > sharper ones will join in. Hmm, lets talk about this for a moment. First off, I would like to point out that robpar has completely ignored my postings where I provided rebuttals, with sources. Second Robpar says "These pro-lofe/pro-choice debates can become very heated." And in the VERY NEXT SENTENCE Robpar says, "However the current Pro-lifers posting here are rather lame." Could that be one of the reasons they become heated? > As always study both sides of a question and make your own decision. Go to > Center for disease control and check out their info on abortions. Better than > google. > More back ground on my self, we raised 2 really good children have 5 grand > kids. Came close to being great grand parents last year, unfortunately the > pregnancy went sour and had to be terminated. > My sister in law is head surgical nurse in a local hospital, that does all the > abortions for Family Planning. My cousin runs the family planning center, > another cousin is leader for the local operation rescue. He is trying to get me > to return to the church. So I am inside on all fronts on the question. Best way > to describe my position is Pro-choice with having the child the best choice. > It`s the womans choice, if she chooses wrong she pays. > The cruelest thing that can happen to a child is to be unwanted. The cruelest thing that can happen to a child is for the mother to act irresponsible, bring the unwanted child into this world, only to butcher it.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |