Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Any anti-abortion atheists?





"robpar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:33:38 -0600, Erica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (robpar) wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 Dec 2003 15:10:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erica) wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> >The fact that I did so through excessive sarcasm is my bad. I just got
> >> >slightly steamed, is all. But robparr's tone didn't warrent it, so I'm
> >> >sorry.
> >> >
> >>   I tend to be very sarcastic when flaming a so called Pro-Lifer.
Which you
> >> appeared to be with the religious bigots. In using their lies about a
near
> >> full
> >> term abortion. Which is only used when there is no hope of saving the
baby,
> >> and
> >> the mothers life is at stake.
> >
> >I'm personally pro-life for my own choice, but pro-choice otherwise, if
> >that makes sense.
>
> Makes perfect sense, I share that position, and it is the most widely
accepted
> position among the Pro-Choice.
>
> > I am also woefully underinformed on the subject and
> >reacting on pure emotion (not that this ever stopped anyone on usenet
> >from jumping right into a discussion, mind you). No lies, just reacting
> >very subjectively on less than adequate data.
> >
> >Thank you for your first hand information. You are indeed operating from
> >a position that is better informed than mine. I will therefore bow out
> >of the discussion and toddle over to google to do a bit of research.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Erica
> Hang around, but try to avoid making anything personal. These
> pro-lofe/pro-choice debates can become very heated.
>  However the current Pro-lifers posting here are rather lame.Maybe some of
the
> sharper ones will join in.

Hmm, lets talk about this for a moment.

First off, I would like to point out that robpar has completely ignored my
postings where I provided rebuttals, with sources.

Second

Robpar says "These pro-lofe/pro-choice debates can become very heated."

And in the VERY NEXT SENTENCE  Robpar says,

"However the current Pro-lifers posting here are rather lame."

Could that be one of the reasons they become heated?




>   As always study both sides of a question and make your own decision. Go
to
> Center for disease control  and check out their info on abortions. Better
than
> google.
>    More back ground on my self, we raised 2 really good children have 5
grand
> kids. Came close to being great grand parents last year, unfortunately the
> pregnancy went sour and had to be terminated.
>   My sister in law is head surgical nurse in a local hospital, that does
all the
> abortions for Family Planning. My cousin runs the family planning center,
> another cousin is leader for the local operation rescue.  He is trying to
get me
> to return to the church. So I am inside on all fronts on the question.
Best way
> to describe my position is Pro-choice with having the child the best
choice.
> It`s the womans choice,  if she chooses wrong she pays.
>   The cruelest thing that can happen to a child is to be unwanted.

The cruelest thing that can happen to a child is for the mother to act
irresponsible, bring the unwanted child into this world, only to butcher it.





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.