
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:36:31 GMT, "Dr. DuFonet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: .... >I did find a reply from tjhe poster and wrote another message but >unfortunatel;y deleted the wrong one. here it is resurrected form deleted >items: Which really screws up the attributions, so I'll just ignore who wrote what.... .... >> I was thinking more about finding abortion morally wrong. Of course a >> person can think it's a bad thing and still be pro-choice. > >Morally wrong is bringing the definition of morals into it, which is a >social definition, taking it outside the couples' decision process. Not so. You have personal morals, and you have people who claim that their personal morals are society's morals. Not to mention that most people are quite flexible in their morals, excusing immoral behaviour on their part for various reasons. >....The main causes of abortion are poverty >and male unemployment, the latter condition which is used as a population >control mechanism. The main cause of abortion is unwanted pregnancies -- unwanted because you do not wish to create a child at that time. The reasons for not wanting a child can be varied -- but poverty is obviously not a problem since poor people seem to have more children than rich people.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |