
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Osprey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > "Erica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Bob Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > > The current law about abortion , according to roe vs wade, is that it is > > > > a private matter between a woman and her doctor in the first trimester. > > > > After that, it is up to the state, as long as they have a provision for > > > > medical reasons. > > > > > > > > Third trimester abortions are very rare, and are regulated already. > > > > Would you rather let someone have an abortion, or just let the woman > > die? > > > > > > > > I suspect you would let the woman die. > > > > > > Bob, dude, buddy, pal, ye ol' top poster -- which one of us are you > > > replying to. > > > > > > Eh, I'll answer for me, just in case. > > > > > > First off, I'm pro-choice, you shmuck. I hope you can see that your > > > last presumably knee-jerk statement wasn't fair considering you didn't > > > know where I stood except in relation to one statement made by > > > robparr. More specifically, my own personal decision would be > > > pro-life; however, I would not presume to tell another woman what to > > > do. To even try would be ridiculous. She's going to do whatever she > > > wants, legal or illegal, regardless. How could she not, after all is > > > said and done it's STILL her body. > > > > Just to help you understand the other side. You are entitled to your > > opinion, and I am not suggesting that you have to change them. > > Many of us who do believe in God, realize that our body's are not just ours. > > God has given us life, and it is our responsibility to take care of our > > bodies and protect life. This means protecting the unborn. God has given > > us the wonderful miracle of being able to create life. A woman's womb, it > > is her responsibility not only for herself but to God, to protect the > > unborn. That is how many of us view our bodies and the unborn. Now > > granted, reading your previous post, you may go on the attack. I would hope > > not. I am only responding to you so you may get a better understanding on > > how others view the issue. > > > > > I really love it when people say something like this. They say: "You > are entitled to your opinion, and I am not suggesting that you have to > change them." What is wrong with that? > but then they go on to say that God has given US life and it's OUR > responsibility to take care of OUR bodies... Yep, my opinion. God has given US this > wonderful miracle. Correct again I especially like the "A woman's womb, it is her > responsibility not only for herself but to God, to protect the > unborn." Correct again > > So in the same sentence, this person said: you're entitled to your > opinions, as long as you service your greater responsibility to God. No, I didn't say that. > Amazing how short sited that is. What is amazing even more is you adding to my statements and expecting people to believe you. When you make statements like that, > are you really respecting others opinions? Yes Are you really respecting > others rights to choose their religious beliefs? Yes don't think so. > You're saying that even though you don't believe in God, you still > bend to God's will. I didn't say that > I personally don't believe in God, Your choice and I don't > have to do anything that respects a God except respect others' rights > to choose their religious beliefs. Again, your choice > > > > > > > > Second, I was just pointing out the ludicousness of robparr's criteria > > > for what constitutes a human being, ie not until fetus is born does it > > > become a human being. At least that's what I got from that statement. > > > Well, that's too late. Way, WAY too late. And, as you say, abortions > > > at that point are already regulated. > > > > The fetus is a human being. From the moment of conception. We do not become > > a "person" until after birth. > > There is a difference. And the ONLY reason for that, is for legal reasons > > only. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The fact that I did so through excessive sarcasm is my bad. > > > > That is a shame that you have to be that way. I would like to suggest that > > you try to understand the other side, if you want to have your opinions > > understood. > > When you use sarcasm, you only defeat yourself. > > > > I just got > > > slightly steamed, is all. But robparr's tone didn't warrent it, so I'm > > > sorry. > > > > > > My criteria leans more toward "viable outside the womb without > > > extraordinary assistance," though I think that the entire issue is way > > > too complex to make alot of sweeping black and white statements. > > > > > > Out of curiousity though, does anyone know what sort of medical > > > emergency would have to be happening for a late-term abortion, > > > presumably partial birth, to be needed, rather than some sort of > > > cesarian procedure where the child may, or may not, survive? > > > > This is a good argument and one reason I do not support PBA. I can't think > > of any reason why a cesarian can't be done to save both mother and child. > > > > > > > > > > As for the choices of mothers and their families in regard to > > > earlier-term fetuses, that would be up to the individuals involved and > > > the situations they find themselves. I would hope that life doesn't > > > become so cheap that such decisions are taken frivously. Most of the > > > time I'm sure they are not. Nevertheless, it doesn't matter what you, > > > I or Pope John Paul say about the situation. The people actually > > > involved are the ones who have to live with their decisions, and will > > > need counseling and support either way. > > > > > > I would also hope that such counseling would include all the options, > > > as opposed to the "You're pregnant. You don't wanna be. You don't have > > > to be" quickie counseling that my friend got when she was 16. She > > > still regrets the decision she made, and feels that if she'd had more > > > information, she might have acted differently.And that goes for the > > > death penalty, euthanasia, war -- other areas that should be > > > considered if one is "pro-life." > > > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |