
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (robpar) wrote: > On 1 Dec 2003 15:10:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erica) wrote: > > > >The fact that I did so through excessive sarcasm is my bad. I just got > >slightly steamed, is all. But robparr's tone didn't warrent it, so I'm > >sorry. > > > I tend to be very sarcastic when flaming a so called Pro-Lifer. Which you > appeared to be with the religious bigots. In using their lies about a near > full > term abortion. Which is only used when there is no hope of saving the baby, > and > the mothers life is at stake. I'm personally pro-life for my own choice, but pro-choice otherwise, if that makes sense. I am also woefully underinformed on the subject and reacting on pure emotion (not that this ever stopped anyone on usenet from jumping right into a discussion, mind you). No lies, just reacting very subjectively on less than adequate data. Thank you for your first hand information. You are indeed operating from a position that is better informed than mine. I will therefore bow out of the discussion and toddle over to google to do a bit of research. Cheers Erica
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |