Re: Any anti-abortion atheists?

Osprey wrote:
> "Bob Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Erica wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Out of curiousity though, does anyone know what sort of medical
> > > emergency would have to be happening for a late-term abortion,
> > > presumably partial birth,  to be needed, rather than some sort of
> > > cesarian procedure where the child may, or may not, survive?
> >
> > A hypercephlic baby would is not viable, and there for is not a
> > may or may not survive child. Cesarians, as you might know, is
> > a very invasive procdedure compared to the so-called 'partial birth'.
> > For a woman that is having comlicplications above and beyond having
> > a non-viable fetus would have a much high risk with a ceasrean above
> > and beyond the much longer recovery of having her stomach cut open.
>
>
> The argument never was about non-viable.  The argument against banning the
> PBA was because pro-choice said there was no exception for a woman's life at
> risk.  The fetus would still be viable, and a c-section can be done that
> could save both her and the child.
>
> By the way, her stomach isn't cut open.  Basic biology may help you.