
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 21 Nov 2003 02:48:40 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner) wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL >PROTECTED]>... >> On 20 Nov 2003 06:03:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner) >> wrote: >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL >> >PROTECTED]>... >> >> On 20 Nov 2003 02:32:27 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner) >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message >> >> >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> >> >> >>BTW Kilner has acknowledged the existence of a School of Applied >> >> >> >>Divinity at Harvard in the thread entitled "Phony Revd now claims to >> >> >> >>be Omnipresent!" If you think he's lying, I suggest you take it up >> >> >> >>with him directly. LOL!!! >> >> >> > >> >> >> >So, James is mistaken. There is no School of Applied Divinity at >> >> >> >Harvard. >> >> >> >> >> >> So why don't you tell him and let him wriggle out of it? >> >> > >> >> >It might help if you quoted me accurately. There is no School of >> >> >Applied Divinity at Harvard. It is simply the 'Harvard Divinity >> >> >School' as I said in that thread. >> >> >> >> You specifically said "Applied Divinity". That is an accurate quote. >> >> Don't even think of lying about it. >> > >> >However, look elsewhere and you'll see that that was the only time >> >that I ever reffered to an applied divinity school at Harvard and >> >every other time I simply said divinity. >> >> There's no conceivable reason why Harvard shouldn't have both. > >Correct. The fact remains, it doesn't. You seem to think it does >though. No, you seemed to think it did. Until I pointed it out to you. >> >It is an accurate quote of >> >one sentence in which I made a mistake. >> >> So you say. Give one reason you should be believed. > >You are not a mind-reader, you do not know what I was thinking when I >wrote the sentence. What you think is reflected in what you write. That's the way it works. >> >> >http://www.hds.harvard.edu/registrar/index.html >> >> > >> >> >Brian is 100% correct, there is no School of Applied Divinity at >> >> >Harvard. I never said there was, you are lying to try to cover up >> >> >your own failings. >> >> >> >> You did say there was. I knew you'd start wriggling when your lie was >> >> exposed. >> > >> >You agreed there was. I have now noticed my mistake, will you >> >continue to assert that it does in fact exist, when the only source >> >that said it did exist was a mistake on my part? >> >> I never said it existed. That's why I kept questioning your lie. > >You never questioned it once. At no point did you say 'Why are you >lying about there being a school of Applied Divinity at Harvard?' or >words to that effect. I did indeed. >> >> >> >The fact that he is mistaken does not mean that he is lying. You on >> >> >> >the other hand do deliberately and constantly lie. >> >> >> >> >> >> You on the third hand lie instinctively. It's not even deliberate. >> >> >> It just comes naturally. >> >> > >> >> >There was no lie, there was no mistaking. >> > >> >Correction, there was no mistaking, there was a simple mistake. >> > >> >> There most certainly was. And now there is wriggling. >> >> >> >> > There is a Harvard Divinity >> >> >School as I have previously stated, there is no School of Applied >> >> >Divinity at Harvard. You are a blatant liar and your lies are all to >> >> >easily exposed. >> >> >> >> Listen to this. Your lie gets exposed and you have the chutzpah to >> >> accuse *me* of lying! >> > >> >What lie? I made a mistake. Perhaps if you were unsure about whether >> >I meant the Harvard Divinity School or the School of Applied Divinity >> >at Harvard, you should have queried in the first place instead of now >> >using it as an excuse to get on your high horse. >> >> I did query it. You ignored my query. > >Your actual quote was 'You'd better tell Brian Blankovitz that. He >doesn't think a Schol/Department of Applied Divinity exists anywhere >in the world'. Since when does you asking me to tell someone that >something does or does not exist consitute a query directed at me >about the existence of the department? You were supposed to draw the appropriate inference, Kilner. If you know what an inference is.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |