Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Those stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid Jews.





On 21 Nov 2003 02:48:40 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner)
wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
>PROTECTED]>...
>> On 20 Nov 2003 06:03:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner)
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
>> >PROTECTED]>...
>> >> On 20 Nov 2003 02:32:27 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner)
>> >> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message 
>> >> >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >> >> >>BTW Kilner has acknowledged the existence of a School of Applied
>> >> >> >>Divinity at Harvard in the thread entitled "Phony Revd now claims to
>> >> >> >>be Omnipresent!"  If you think he's lying, I suggest you take it up
>> >> >> >>with him directly.  LOL!!!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >So, James is mistaken. There is no School of Applied Divinity at
>> >> >> >Harvard. 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> So why don't you tell him and let him wriggle out of it?
>> >> >
>> >> >It might help if you quoted me accurately.  There is no School of
>> >> >Applied Divinity at Harvard.  It is simply the 'Harvard Divinity
>> >> >School' as I said in that thread.
>> >> 
>> >> You specifically said "Applied Divinity".  That is an accurate quote.
>> >> Don't even think of lying about it.
>> >
>> >However, look elsewhere and you'll see that that was the only time
>> >that I ever reffered to an applied divinity school at Harvard and
>> >every other time I simply said divinity.
>> 
>> There's no conceivable reason why Harvard shouldn't have both.
>
>Correct.  The fact remains, it doesn't.  You seem to think it does
>though.

No, you seemed to think it did.  Until I pointed it out to you.

>> >It is an accurate quote of
>> >one sentence in which I made a mistake.
>> 
>> So you say.  Give one reason you should be believed.
>
>You are not a mind-reader, you do not know what I was thinking when I
>wrote the sentence.

What you think is reflected in what you write.  That's the way it
works.

>> >> >http://www.hds.harvard.edu/registrar/index.html
>> >> >
>> >> >Brian is 100% correct, there is no School of Applied Divinity at
>> >> >Harvard.  I never said there was, you are lying to try to cover up
>> >> >your own failings.
>> >> 
>> >> You did say there was.  I knew you'd start wriggling when your lie was
>> >> exposed.  
>> >
>> >You agreed there was.  I have now noticed my mistake, will you
>> >continue to assert that it does in fact exist, when the only source
>> >that said it did exist was a mistake on my part?
>> 
>> I never said it existed.  That's why I kept questioning your lie.
>
>You never questioned it once.  At no point did you say 'Why are you
>lying about there being a school of Applied Divinity at Harvard?' or
>words to that effect.

I did indeed.

>> >> >> >The fact that he is mistaken does not mean that he is lying. You on
>> >> >> >the other hand do deliberately and constantly lie.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> You on the third hand lie instinctively.  It's not even deliberate.
>> >> >> It just comes naturally.
>> >> >
>> >> >There was no lie, there was no mistaking. 
>> >
>> >Correction, there was no mistaking, there was a simple mistake.
>> >
>> >> There most certainly was.  And now there is wriggling.
>> >> 
>> >> > There is a Harvard Divinity
>> >> >School as I have previously stated, there is no School of Applied
>> >> >Divinity at Harvard.  You are a blatant liar and your lies are all to
>> >> >easily exposed.
>> >> 
>> >> Listen to this.  Your lie gets exposed and you have the chutzpah to
>> >> accuse *me* of lying!
>> >
>> >What lie?  I made a mistake.  Perhaps if you were unsure about whether
>> >I meant the Harvard Divinity School or the School of Applied Divinity
>> >at Harvard, you should have queried in the first place instead of now
>> >using it as an excuse to get on your high horse.
>> 
>> I did query it.  You ignored my query.
>
>Your actual quote was 'You'd better tell Brian Blankovitz that.  He
>doesn't think a Schol/Department of Applied Divinity exists anywhere
>in the world'.  Since when does you asking me to tell someone that
>something does or does not exist consitute a query directed at me
>about the existence of the department?

You were supposed to draw the appropriate inference, Kilner.  If you
know what an inference is.




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.