Re: Those stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid Jews.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>...
> On 20 Nov 2003 06:03:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner)
> wrote:
> 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
> >PROTECTED]>...
> >> On 20 Nov 2003 02:32:27 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kilner)
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message 
> >> >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> >>BTW Kilner has acknowledged the existence of a School of Applied
> >> >> >>Divinity at Harvard in the thread entitled "Phony Revd now claims to
> >> >> >>be Omnipresent!"  If you think he's lying, I suggest you take it up
> >> >> >>with him directly.  LOL!!!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >So, James is mistaken. There is no School of Applied Divinity at
> >> >> >Harvard. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> So why don't you tell him and let him wriggle out of it?
> >> >
> >> >It might help if you quoted me accurately.  There is no School of
> >> >Applied Divinity at Harvard.  It is simply the 'Harvard Divinity
> >> >School' as I said in that thread.
> >> 
> >> You specifically said "Applied Divinity".  That is an accurate quote.
> >> Don't even think of lying about it.
> >
> >However, look elsewhere and you'll see that that was the only time
> >that I ever reffered to an applied divinity school at Harvard and
> >every other time I simply said divinity.
> 
> There's no conceivable reason why Harvard shouldn't have both.

Correct.  The fact remains, it doesn't.  You seem to think it does
though.

> >It is an accurate quote of
> >one sentence in which I made a mistake.
> 
> So you say.  Give one reason you should be believed.

You are not a mind-reader, you do not know what I was thinking when I
wrote the sentence.

> >> >http://www.hds.harvard.edu/registrar/index.html
> >> >
> >> >Brian is 100% correct, there is no School of Applied Divinity at
> >> >Harvard.  I never said there was, you are lying to try to cover up
> >> >your own failings.
> >> 
> >> You did say there was.  I knew you'd start wriggling when your lie was
> >> exposed.  
> >
> >You agreed there was.  I have now noticed my mistake, will you
> >continue to assert that it does in fact exist, when the only source
> >that said it did exist was a mistake on my part?
> 
> I never said it existed.  That's why I kept questioning your lie.

You never questioned it once.  At no point did you say 'Why are you
lying about there being a school of Applied Divinity at Harvard?' or
words to that effect.

> >> >> >The fact that he is mistaken does not mean that he is lying. You on
> >> >> >the other hand do deliberately and constantly lie.
> >> >> 
> >> >> You on the third hand lie instinctively.  It's not even deliberate.
> >> >> It just comes naturally.
> >> >
> >> >There was no lie, there was no mistaking. 
> >
> >Correction, there was no mistaking, there was a simple mistake.
> >
> >> There most certainly was.  And now there is wriggling.
> >> 
> >> > There is a Harvard Divinity
> >> >School as I have previously stated, there is no School of Applied
> >> >Divinity at Harvard.  You are a blatant liar and your lies are all to
> >> >easily exposed.
> >> 
> >> Listen to this.  Your lie gets exposed and you have the chutzpah to
> >> accuse *me* of lying!
> >
> >What lie?  I made a mistake.  Perhaps if you were unsure about whether
> >I meant the Harvard Divinity School or the School of Applied Divinity
> >at Harvard, you should have queried in the first place instead of now
> >using it as an excuse to get on your high horse.
> 
> I did query it.  You ignored my query.

Your actual quote was 'You'd better tell Brian Blankovitz that.  He
doesn't think a Schol/Department of Applied Divinity exists anywhere
in the world'.  Since when does you asking me to tell someone that
something does or does not exist consitute a query directed at me
about the existence of the department?