
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prof. Mo) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > On Thursday August 21, 2003 at 3:45 a.m., the Word of the Lord came to > > me saying, "Speak to the atheist, the agnostic and the humanist. You > > say that there is no God or do not acknowledge me. You believe that it > > is by your on hand and strength that you have prosperity, longevity, > > and good health. [snip] > > Your Lord is kind of odd. Why would he speak to you rather than the > atheist, agnostic and humanist he wants to convince? Why even you had > the sense to do that, but the All-Knowing couldn't make the > connection? Quite right. Prophets are a dangerous breed, licensed schizophrenics. And of course they are their own licensing authority. (They sometimes sign in triplicate.) What would this guy have done if the voice of God had told him to kill somebody? Would he have done it? Or would he have decided that wasn't the real God, and ignored the voice? On what authority? And what would have happened if the "genuine" voice have God had told him to write another book for the Bible? Who would believe his claim to be divinely inspired? It's funny, but nobody seemed to question Paul's authority to proclaim himself directly inspired by Christ, but if "Prof Mo" declared the same he would run the risk of being locked up for his own safety. Since the foundation of the church in Rome nobody has managed to convince the whole Christian church they have got the ear of God. Can you explain why that is the case? Coincidence? Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |