Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Abortion



BlackWater  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>BlackWater  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Anderson) wrote:
>>>> BlackWater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Fact:  The changes that occur at birth to transform a fetus into a
>>>>>>biologically separate and self-contained organism are massive and
>>>>>>irreversable.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Well, not 'irreversible' really ... 
>>>>
>>>>Don't lie to me.  The changes that occur at birth cannot be reversed
>>>>and the baby cannot be placed back into the womb.
>>>
>>>   Of course it can ... indeed they ARE.
>>
>>NEVER has a fetus been born and then reconnected to a palenta and
>>reinserted into the womb.  It is not medically possible.
>
>   If they can re-attach a severed arm and make it
>   work, they can do that.

That makes no sense at all.

>    Maybe nobody has TRIED
>   yet, but the capability is there. 

No, it is not.  It is impossible to reverse childbirth.

>>>    There's more 
>>>   and more surgery on fetuses -
>>
>>Which does not make them born.  That's a pretty pathetic excuse 
>>for an outright lie.
>
>   What IS "born" in your book ... 

The same meaning that everybody on the planet except you seems
to know about.

-- 
Ray Fischer         
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.