Re: A compromise for the abortion debate

> The compromise:
> 1. To satisfy the Pro-Lifers:  We will let nature decide who can  and
> can't be aborted.  In roughly *half* the cases the life of the unborn
> will be preserved.  Thus satisfying at least a portion of the pro-life
> agenda.  Hey that's a good first step isn't it ? Who  would pass up
> that opportunity to make some headway.
> 2. To satisfy the Pro-Choicers: If the unborn fetus is a male, then
> quickly, unequivocally, with no questions asked...kill it (him). Go
> home and feel good that you made the wise choice for yourself.  
> But... if the unborn fetus is a female then she has a choice.  Since
> the female fetus is unable to understand or comprehend the gravity of
> the decision at hand, much less make her choice known in response...
> the choice must be deferred until said female fetus is able to perform
> the said choice.  I suggest 16 years old, in a formal court hearing
> that the female may then exercises her choice, to live or not.

Nice one....but there's one problem. I'm a man, therefore that gives
me no right to live past my embryonic stage if my mother wanted to
abort me. ???
poor me....