Re: Abortion

A Planet Visitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:03:55 -0500, Krisblake
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> 
>>On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:53:31 -0000, "j.rennie1"
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Krisblake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:21:17 -0000, "j.rennie1"
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >"Craig Chilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> >> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:40:49 -0500,
>>>> >> Krisblake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >> >  Craig Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >> >>  "j.rennie1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>  Craig Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>> "j.rennie1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>>>  "--sexkitten--" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [ ... ]
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >>>>>>     You admitted killing children is illegal.  Abortion
>>>> >> >>>>>>     is 
>>>legal,
>>>> >> >>>>>> therefore fetuses are not children, and abortion is not
>>>> >> >>>>>> murder. Thanks for agreeing with us.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >>>>>     When does a foetus become a child oh wise one?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >>>>     Easiest question in the world to answer:  At BIRTH. 
>>>> >> >>>>     And not 
>>>> >> >>>> a second sooner or later.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >>>     Dear old Craig - still spewing crap as ever.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >>    Thanks for your further CONFIRMATION that one needs to be
>>>> >> >> among the world's most ignorant people just to BE an
>>>> >> >> Anti-Choicer. 
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>    I've provided dozens of solid FACTS that support the
>>>> >> >>    Pro-Choice 
>>>> >> >> stance.  But I've never known of an Anti-Choicer to produce
>>>> >> >> even ONE fact that supports theirs.  All they do is whine and
>>>> >> >> lie... just 
>>>> >like
>>>> >> >> you just did.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >    "j.rennie1" is a "reluctant Pro-Choicer," so they claim.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>     I've run across him before.  He's NO Pro-Choicer, as his
>>>> >> comment above makes clear.
>>>> >
>>>> >You see in Craig's eyes one cannot be a 'reluctant' pro-choicer -
>>>> >you have to be mad keen on abortion at any time for any reason
>>>> >to be a pro-choicer..
>>>>
>>>> No, that is not what Pro-Choice is all about. Pro-Choice is ALL
>>>> about supporting a woman's right to choose, which includes
>>>> continuing pregnancy.
>>>
>>>Your name Craig??
>>
>>No, but I have a right to respond to any post I wish, especially one
>>which contains incorrect information.
> 
> Let me respond then... your 'argument' sucks wind.  

So does your opinion.

> Pro-choice is
> ONLY about pro-abortion.  

Wrong and an outright lie.  And you know it.  

> You simply cannot hijack the term
> pro-life, by presuming that pro-choice is THAT term.  

Anyone who is "for" life can call themselves pro-life.  Almost everyone is 
pro-life.

> Continuing
> pregnancy IS the pro-life choice.  

Continuing a pregnancy is pro-choice.

> Choosing to TERMINATE
> that life is pro-choice.  

Choosing to terminate a pregnancy is also pro-choice.

The two terms in all rational dialogs
> pertain to two different concepts.
> 
Pro-choice means just what it implies with regards to reproductive 
decisions.  So does anti-choice.  

> PV
> 
>