Re: Undermining Society's Morals

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Papa Jack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spartakus) wrote in message 
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Papa Jack) wrote...
> 
> ========================================================================
> [snip by Spartiakus]
> ========================================================================
> >> Papa Jack wrote: 
> >> WE ARE NOT DISCUSSING WHAT THE MORAL CODE SHOULD 
> >> BE.  We are discussing  WHO (i.e., the legislatures 
> >> or the courts) should be influenced by those moral 
> >> codes when enacting laws.
> 
> ========================================================================
> > Spartiakus wrote:
> > Disingenuous fuckwit.  
> 
> ========================================================================
> Papa Jack commented:
> Great start, Spartiakus.  That lets our readers
> know right away you are an intellectual who backs 
> up his words with substance.   8^)

This, from a guy who cut and pastes stories in a way that makes them
look like they say things they don't...

> 
> ========================================================================
> > Spartiakus wrote:
> > If you are not pushing *your* idea of what
> > society's morals should be, what is with the 
> > subject line "Undermining Society's Morals"?
> 
> ========================================================================
> Papa Jack responds:
> Did you bother to read the article which started
> this thread?  In case you missed it:
> 
>    On  November 28, 2003. the Washington Post included 
>    an article by Alan Charles Raul titled: "Undermining 
>    Society's Morals."  Go to:
> 
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17611-2003Nov27.html
> 
> That's why I titled the subject line "Undermining 
> Society's Morals."

What is so "moral" about you constantly violating Federal Law by
violating the copyright laws?  More hypocrisy from Propaganda Jack.

> 
> ========================================================================
> > Spartiakus wrote:
> > And, btw, why do you think the legislature is 
> > *less* likely to "undermine society's morals" 
> > than the courts?
> 
> ========================================================================
> Papa Jack replied:
> That's not the issue.  The issue is which branch
> of government is responsible under the Constitution
> for enacting legislation which reflects the morals
> of our society?  The author, Alan Charles Raul,
> believes the courts are usurping the Constitutional
> authority of the legislatures.  I agree.

So?  Since when do you have any authority?

> 
> Okay, now it's time for you to sputter, jump up 
> and down, and call me "Disingenuous fuckwit" again.

Look in the mirror.