Re: Undermining Society's Morals

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Papa Jack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Papa Jack comments:
> From a legal point of view, what's the difference
> between allowing pologamey and allowing gay 
> marriages?  So long as all parties are consenting
> adults, why should they be banned from doing
> whatever pleases them?  Then, once that's settled,
> what about sex between adults and "consenting" minors?
> Why should we care if men want to have sex with little
> boys -- or very young girls?  What about sex with 
> animals?  Who are YOU to say that is wrong?

OK - so let's use this "logic" of yours on abortion.  If the government
can force a woman to have a child when she is 8 months pregnant, why
not 7?  4? 1? What the hell!  Maybe they can force a woman to get
pregnant!  Maybe they can force women to get pregnant in order to
"save" all those lives that go unfulfilled every month.  Maybe they can
also force young girls to get pregnant, too.

This is the "logic" needed to justify forcing women to give birth
against their will.  Why not apply that twisted Propaganda Jack logic
here?