
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Marie A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Charles & Mambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Dorothy wrote: > > > > > Total denial about what happens in an abortion in all of the answers. No > > > one willing to hook up a suction machine or take an instrument to snip a leg > > > or arm off. No one willing to crush a skull so it can get thru the birth > > > canal. A serial killer has more integrity than all of you. At least a > > > psychotic serial killer can look at what is happening. Pro-aborts are lower > > > than that. > > > > Alright, this is the point where I usually ask the anti-choicers this question: > > > > Hypothetical scenario: you (or your teenage daughter if you are too old) > > have been brutally raped by a gang of criminals, as a result you are > > pregnant, the fetus is deformed and you have been told by several doctors > > that your life is in an extreme danger if you decide to carry the pregnancy > > through. > > > > Do you still go ahead with the pregnancy or do you seek abortion, pardon me, > > snip arms and legs of the "baby" with your own knives? > > Charles, anyone on either side can offer these scenarios, and they're > just as transparent no matter from which direction they come. For > openers, when you put forth such a hypothetical, it's fair to then ask > of you, "Is it your suggestion then that the humanity of an infant > residing in a woman's body is called into question by the mere > circumstances of the pregnancy?" See, it's get a bit tougher at this > point, doesn't it? And it leads to a scenario which in principle isn't > too much different: > > A physician is treating a critically wounded man near death shot by > the police. In the middle of his efforts to save the life of this man, > he learns that this is the man who just killed his wife and children. > How should that knowledge affect his views of the humanity of the man > laying on the table over whom he has the power of life and death? If > it's your answer that it shouldn't, then the question arises as to why > you posed this query to begin with. In like manner, how do the > circumstances of a pregnancy bear on the sanctity of the human life > being destroyed? Never forget for a moment that a woman's "right" to > abort a child is the power over life and death itself, a unilateral > right granted to no one else in this society. > > What I'm trying to do here, dear child, is that of asking you to think > in terms of overarching principles as against raising circumstances > which make no sense unless we're so guided in our thinking. You're > neither right or wrong here, but asking the right questions helps us > in sorting these things out. We're not aided in understanding > premeditated murder by pondering deaths which arise as a result of > automobile accidents. > > Cordially, Marie Good point Marie. Let's add another scenario. Should the pro-life physician have the right to end the life of a someone who is a major player in the pro-abort establishment? I can just hear the answer. No, the major player has already been born, making it wrong. They want everything to be relative in order to support their life, which they think is important. Thank heavens we pro-lifers support all human life and don't think as they do.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |