Re: Undermining Society's Morals

On 2 Dec 2003 08:30:50 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Papa Jack) wrote:

>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spartakus) wrote in message 
>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Papa Jack) wrote...
>
>========================================================================
>[snip by Spartiakus]
>========================================================================
>>> Papa Jack wrote: 
>>> WE ARE NOT DISCUSSING WHAT THE MORAL CODE SHOULD 
>>> BE.  We are discussing  WHO (i.e., the legislatures 
>>> or the courts) should be influenced by those moral 
>>> codes when enacting laws.
>
>========================================================================
>> Spartiakus wrote:
>> Disingenuous fuckwit.  
>
>========================================================================
>Papa Jack commented:
>Great start, Spartiakus.  That lets our readers
>know right away you are an intellectual who backs 
>up his words with substance.   8^)
>
>========================================================================
>> Spartiakus wrote:
>> If you are not pushing *your* idea of what
>> society's morals should be, what is with the 
>> subject line "Undermining Society's Morals"?
>
>========================================================================
>Papa Jack responds:
>Did you bother to read the article which started
>this thread?  In case you missed it:
>
>   On  November 28, 2003. the Washington Post included 
>   an article by Alan Charles Raul titled: "Undermining 
>   Society's Morals."  Go to:
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17611-2003Nov27.html
>
>That's why I titled the subject line "Undermining 
>Society's Morals."
>
>========================================================================
>> Spartiakus wrote:
>> And, btw, why do you think the legislature is 
>> *less* likely to "undermine society's morals" 
>> than the courts?
>
>========================================================================
>Papa Jack replied:
>That's not the issue.  The issue is which branch
>of government is responsible under the Constitution
>for enacting legislation which reflects the morals
>of our society?  The author, Alan Charles Raul,
>believes the courts are usurping the Constitutional
>authority of the legislatures.  I agree.
>
>Okay, now it's time for you to sputter, jump up 
>and down, and call me "Disingenuous fuckwit" again.

Well, Alan Charles Raul seems to be a disingenuous fuckwit for
blanding asserting that it is the function of ANY branch of government
to enact legislation which 'reflects the morals' of society.

If you agree with him, then.....

-
Larry
(this space unintentionally left blank .....
make obvious deletion for email