Re: Any anti-abortion atheists?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Charles & Mambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:

>
>OK, even though you clearly refuse to answer my question, I'll answer yours: 
>no abortions are *ever* performed in the third trimester at the whim of a 
>pregnant woman, not only because they are banned and illegal, but also 
>because no doctor would allow and perform elective abortions this late in 
>the pregnancy.
**********************
Dorothy refuses to answer any questions that take "her" out of her own realm of
reality.  The prospect of actually admitting that "third trimester abortions"
are not only *illegal* (in the sense of infanticide) but that most often result
in a healthy and viable baby, are foreign to "her."  

 Not only will Dorothy refuse to admit that second and third trimester
abortions are illegal (in as much as "on demand" is concerned) but she
adamently insists that they are "done all the time."  Dorothy would much prefer
(as most anti-abortion advocates) that OBGYNs be characterized as foaming at
the mouth nomes, with grins larger than life, and pointy little teeth, just
salavating over their next kill. 
------------------------------------------------
>You *know* that the third trimester abortions are not legal and you *know* 
>they're performed exclusively when the life of a woman is in jeopardy, yet 
>you continue to lie and spread misinformation. I find this appalling.
*******************
As do I.  That is the only reason that I even bother with this NG at all.  I
find the load of horseshit brought into this NG by the anti-abortion
proponents, repeatedly, the most irritating thing on the face of the planet. 
If it were not for a desire to set the record straight, I would have been long
out of here years ago.  There is simply no excuse for those who come to this NG
seeking answers to be continually inundated with lies, deceptions and
propagandas, all for the sake of very "self-centered" agendas.  The
anti-abortion proponents seek only condemnation and "control" over others. If
that were not so, they would be "pro-choice."