Re: Liberal Motto: Stay Out Of My Bedroom and quit spending into deficit oblivion!

"JoettaB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "JoettaB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "Marie A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pavil Natanovich) wrote in message
> > > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > (snip)
> > > > >
> > > > > Purple notes the same thing I have long noticed.  How often does
> > > > > something have to be repeated before it assumes a truth of its
own?
> > > > > "The 'promotion' of gay marriage has 'devestating' consequences."
I
> > > > > have heard numerous conservatives link homosexuality with
> pedophilia.
> > > > > It is done unconsciously (as most conservative thinking is
> > > > > unconcious).
> > > >
> > > > You state, "How often does something have to be repeated before it
> > > > assumes a truth of its own?" Well, since every question can be
> > > > re-framed, what if I cast it in this manner: How often does
something
> > > > have to be denied before the denial
> > > > assumes credibility? Well, in the case of denying a link between
> > > > homosexuality and pedophilia, you can deny it until the sun winks
out
> > > > but it won't change the truth of the observation that a link indeed
> > > > exists. Now, of course one can get around this by redefining things,
> > > > as in the case of redefining pedophilia to include a broad class of
> > > > homosexual priests who assaulted young boys, but that dog won't
hunt.
> > > > You can count on one hand the girls molested by these priests, and
> > > > that behavior simply doesn't fit the profile of pedophilia as
commonly
> > > > understood.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > should be superceded by community interests.  This again is
completely
> > > > backwards
> > > > > from what one might hope to expect.  When I think "conservative,"
I
> > > > > tend to think of individual rights NOT being trampled by
government
> > > > > authority.  Why is it then so-called liberal organizations like
the
> > > > > ACLU are the ones most staunchly defending individual rights,
while
> > > > > right-wing zealots seek to tear them down?
> > > >
> > > > Sir, what you may or may not "tend to think" about anything has
about
> > > > as much bearing on reality as your last dream. Just as many of us
> > > > "tend to think" quite the opposite, that totalitarianism and
> > > > authoritarian thinking invariably arises from the left, from a
> > > > socialist mindset which is the hallmark of liberal thinking. When
> > > > liberals decry government interference in our lives, their concerns
> > > > invariably center around sexual matters and licentious behaviors.
> > > > However, in almost any other area you care to name, the sky's the
> > > > limit with your gang where tolerance of the state in our personal
> > > > affairs is concerned.
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest to you that no greater damage can be done to a
people
> > > > than through the taxing and regulatory mechanisms of the state, yet
I
> > > > have never met a liberal who didn't instantly fall in love with a
tax,
> > > > any tax. It's not conservatives pushing for ever higher taxes and
ever
> > > > more punishing regulations. No, it's your crowd doing this, and if
any
> > > > government has it in its power to utterly destroy us, it's through
> > > > extortionist taxes and draconian regulations which effectively
> > > > determine what we can do, where we can do it and how we do it. But
> > > > none of this seems to worry your crowd.
> > > >
> > > > Given my druthers, I would far prefer life under a government which
> > > > peeks it's nose into my bedroom from time to time than one which
aims
> > > > to steal my home AND bedroom because liberals like you would rather
> > > > tax me into the poorhouse by way of redistributing my money as you
see
> > > > fit. The former I can live with, while the latter will reduce me to
> > > > pushing a shopping cart. There's a hierarchy to freedoms, the theft
of
> > > > certain ones rendering others problematic.
> > > >
> > > > Cordially, Marie
> > >
> > > I should have know that Marie A. was in on this type of drivel. But,
not
> > > only to the democrats want you out of our bedrooms, but we want Bush
to
> > > quit spending like tomorrow will never come all to the benefit of his
> > > billionaire pals.
> >
> > For example?
> >
>
> Can you say "Haliburton"?

"Spending like tomorrow will never come" translates to precisely how much
money, and what makes Halliburton Bush's pal?

>
> > >
> > > JoettaB
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>