Re: Liberal Motto: Stay Out Of My Bedroom and quit spending into deficit oblivion!

"Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "JoettaB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Marie A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pavil Natanovich) wrote in message
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > (snip)
> > > >
> > > > Purple notes the same thing I have long noticed.  How often does
> > > > something have to be repeated before it assumes a truth of its own?
> > > > "The 'promotion' of gay marriage has 'devestating' consequences."  I
> > > > have heard numerous conservatives link homosexuality with
pedophilia.
> > > > It is done unconsciously (as most conservative thinking is
> > > > unconcious).
> > >
> > > You state, "How often does something have to be repeated before it
> > > assumes a truth of its own?" Well, since every question can be
> > > re-framed, what if I cast it in this manner: How often does something
> > > have to be denied before the denial
> > > assumes credibility? Well, in the case of denying a link between
> > > homosexuality and pedophilia, you can deny it until the sun winks out
> > > but it won't change the truth of the observation that a link indeed
> > > exists. Now, of course one can get around this by redefining things,
> > > as in the case of redefining pedophilia to include a broad class of
> > > homosexual priests who assaulted young boys, but that dog won't hunt.
> > > You can count on one hand the girls molested by these priests, and
> > > that behavior simply doesn't fit the profile of pedophilia as commonly
> > > understood.
> > >
> > >
> > > should be superceded by community interests.  This again is completely
> > > backwards
> > > > from what one might hope to expect.  When I think "conservative," I
> > > > tend to think of individual rights NOT being trampled by government
> > > > authority.  Why is it then so-called liberal organizations like the
> > > > ACLU are the ones most staunchly defending individual rights, while
> > > > right-wing zealots seek to tear them down?
> > >
> > > Sir, what you may or may not "tend to think" about anything has about
> > > as much bearing on reality as your last dream. Just as many of us
> > > "tend to think" quite the opposite, that totalitarianism and
> > > authoritarian thinking invariably arises from the left, from a
> > > socialist mindset which is the hallmark of liberal thinking. When
> > > liberals decry government interference in our lives, their concerns
> > > invariably center around sexual matters and licentious behaviors.
> > > However, in almost any other area you care to name, the sky's the
> > > limit with your gang where tolerance of the state in our personal
> > > affairs is concerned.
> > >
> > > I would suggest to you that no greater damage can be done to a people
> > > than through the taxing and regulatory mechanisms of the state, yet I
> > > have never met a liberal who didn't instantly fall in love with a tax,
> > > any tax. It's not conservatives pushing for ever higher taxes and ever
> > > more punishing regulations. No, it's your crowd doing this, and if any
> > > government has it in its power to utterly destroy us, it's through
> > > extortionist taxes and draconian regulations which effectively
> > > determine what we can do, where we can do it and how we do it. But
> > > none of this seems to worry your crowd.
> > >
> > > Given my druthers, I would far prefer life under a government which
> > > peeks it's nose into my bedroom from time to time than one which aims
> > > to steal my home AND bedroom because liberals like you would rather
> > > tax me into the poorhouse by way of redistributing my money as you see
> > > fit. The former I can live with, while the latter will reduce me to
> > > pushing a shopping cart. There's a hierarchy to freedoms, the theft of
> > > certain ones rendering others problematic.
> > >
> > > Cordially, Marie
> >
> > I should have know that Marie A. was in on this type of drivel. But, not
> > only to the democrats want you out of our bedrooms, but we want Bush to
> > quit spending like tomorrow will never come all to the benefit of his
> > billionaire pals.
>
> For example?
>

Can you say "Haliburton"?

> >
> > JoettaB
> >
> >
>
>