Re: Liberal Motto: Stay Out Of My Bedroom and quit spending into deficit oblivion!

"JoettaB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Marie A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pavil Natanovich) wrote in message
> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > (snip)
> > >
> > > Purple notes the same thing I have long noticed.  How often does
> > > something have to be repeated before it assumes a truth of its own?
> > > "The 'promotion' of gay marriage has 'devestating' consequences."  I
> > > have heard numerous conservatives link homosexuality with pedophilia.
> > > It is done unconsciously (as most conservative thinking is
> > > unconcious).
> >
> > You state, "How often does something have to be repeated before it
> > assumes a truth of its own?" Well, since every question can be
> > re-framed, what if I cast it in this manner: How often does something
> > have to be denied before the denial
> > assumes credibility? Well, in the case of denying a link between
> > homosexuality and pedophilia, you can deny it until the sun winks out
> > but it won't change the truth of the observation that a link indeed
> > exists. Now, of course one can get around this by redefining things,
> > as in the case of redefining pedophilia to include a broad class of
> > homosexual priests who assaulted young boys, but that dog won't hunt.
> > You can count on one hand the girls molested by these priests, and
> > that behavior simply doesn't fit the profile of pedophilia as commonly
> > understood.
> >
> >
> > should be superceded by community interests.  This again is completely
> > backwards
> > > from what one might hope to expect.  When I think "conservative," I
> > > tend to think of individual rights NOT being trampled by government
> > > authority.  Why is it then so-called liberal organizations like the
> > > ACLU are the ones most staunchly defending individual rights, while
> > > right-wing zealots seek to tear them down?
> >
> > Sir, what you may or may not "tend to think" about anything has about
> > as much bearing on reality as your last dream. Just as many of us
> > "tend to think" quite the opposite, that totalitarianism and
> > authoritarian thinking invariably arises from the left, from a
> > socialist mindset which is the hallmark of liberal thinking. When
> > liberals decry government interference in our lives, their concerns
> > invariably center around sexual matters and licentious behaviors.
> > However, in almost any other area you care to name, the sky's the
> > limit with your gang where tolerance of the state in our personal
> > affairs is concerned.
> >
> > I would suggest to you that no greater damage can be done to a people
> > than through the taxing and regulatory mechanisms of the state, yet I
> > have never met a liberal who didn't instantly fall in love with a tax,
> > any tax. It's not conservatives pushing for ever higher taxes and ever
> > more punishing regulations. No, it's your crowd doing this, and if any
> > government has it in its power to utterly destroy us, it's through
> > extortionist taxes and draconian regulations which effectively
> > determine what we can do, where we can do it and how we do it. But
> > none of this seems to worry your crowd.
> >
> > Given my druthers, I would far prefer life under a government which
> > peeks it's nose into my bedroom from time to time than one which aims
> > to steal my home AND bedroom because liberals like you would rather
> > tax me into the poorhouse by way of redistributing my money as you see
> > fit. The former I can live with, while the latter will reduce me to
> > pushing a shopping cart. There's a hierarchy to freedoms, the theft of
> > certain ones rendering others problematic.
> >
> > Cordially, Marie
>
> I should have know that Marie A. was in on this type of drivel. But, not
> only to the democrats want you out of our bedrooms, but we want Bush to
quit
> spending like tomorrow will never come all to the benefit of his
billionaire
> pals.

For example?

>
> JoettaB
>
>