
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marie A.) wrote: >I would suggest to you that no greater damage can be done to a people >than through the taxing and regulatory mechanisms of the state, yet I >have never met a liberal who didn't instantly fall in love with a tax, >any tax. You're openly lying again, as usual. Even when you don't have to lie, you still do. You're addicted. It's a habit you can't break, learned well from your masters. If you're not lying, name a single liberal who loves every tax ever proposed. Oh look, you can't. Imagine that. >It's not conservatives pushing for ever higher taxes and ever >more punishing regulations. Reagan raised taxes on the middle and lower classes, ballooned the size of government and went on a spending spree we're still paying off. Meanwhile, Clinton kept middle/lower class taxes level (up a little for some, down a little for some), shrank the size of government (civilian and military), cut spending (civilian and military), ran surpluses, and generally presided over America's golden age. Which drives you apeshit with jealousy, but that's another topic. Bush comes in, immediately tanks the economy, and in return for a $300 tax break, hands everyone an invoice for $2000 of new debt. Congratulations, dumbass, you just lost $1700, paid to that rich guy over there. I don't mind if you love to give your money away, but stop giving away mine. Conservatism = Mental Illness. Exhibit A, Marie. As taught by her masters at Republican fantasy economics school, she thinks debts never have to be paid off. Government services are paid for by magic pixie dust. And nobility like herself shouldn't have to pay her fair share like the rest of the rabble. Greg Bernath
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |