Re: Abortion

On 30 Nov 2003 15:28:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marie A.) wrote:

>Lawrence E. McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> 
>> As for as aborting the pregnancy within three months, this can also be
>> a problem for women of limited means because of the combination of
>> cost and the lack of availability in many areas.  The
>> anti-abortionists, of course, bear a great deal of responsibility for
>> both of these, since they fight tooth and nail against public funding
>> of abortions for the medically indigent, and make it difficult for an
>> abortion provider to work outside major metropolitan areas.  It is
>> somewhat (only somewhat?) ironic that the anti-abortionist are, in
>> fact, responsible for at least some abortions being performed in the
>> later stages of a pregnancy.
>
>Getting to drive a Mercedes 500SL is also a problem for women of
>limited means. Should we furnish them one at taxpayer's expense? I'd
>fight against that tooth and nail, too. So what? Does that then make
>me responsible for the fact that they're driving clunkers? This makes
>every bit as much sense as what you just said, Larry. Liberals are
>fond of suggesting that those who object to subsidizing social
>pathologies share in the blame for them. Not so, dear boy, and I
>notice you do this quite often. Please explain why your crowd blames
>everyone except those who get themselves in these jams. Explain this
>to us, Larry. Why won't you attack the behavior that leads to these
>problems? Is it because you endorse the behavior, sir?


Well, are you going to be consistent is your opposition to medical
care at taxpayer's expense and fight to abolish all of Medicaid?
Or, just to be even-handed, stop funding obstetical care with taxpayer
funds.  

>
>Cordially, Marie

-
Larry
(this space unintentionally left blank .....
make obvious deletion for email