
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Christian Party" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The public debt is not relevant, since that is both an asset and a >> >> liability: most of the $6 trillion in public debt is owed to people >> >> (1/2 trillion in US treasury notes is part of the household assets) >> >> and US businesses, which people own. >> > >> >Yeah, the people own it allright. The Japanese people, not the American >> >people. >> >> Nope. As I broke out elsewhere, almost half of the American debt is >> owed to the social security and medicare accounts, and to other >> Federal accounts. See below >> >> >You were obviously looking right straight at that chart, so you >> >obviously did notice that TOTAL US government securities owned by US >> >households was only $539 billion in 2001, down 46% in only 5 years. >> >> And down only trivially in 11 years. The bond market goes up and >> down, just like the stock market. > >Which ignores the point that American households own a VERY small portion of >the public debt, which refutes your statement that most of this public debt >is owned by "the people" [where it was presumed that you referred to >American people, rather than the Japanese people who DO own most of it]. Table 1141 gives how much in government securities are owned by the entire foreign sector, which is hardly all Japanese. >What you just recognized is the possibility that wild swings in our stock >market, wherein stock "values" like Cisco accelerated to 32 times revenues >[which compared to stocks like Fujitsu whose stock value is one fourth of >revenue were over-rated by 132 times] were caused by these foreign >"investors". I don't recognize any theory of yours as anything but obnoxium pulled out of your strange orifice. >Add to that the mere specter that a 10% drop in housing prices would cause >mortgage debt to exceed the asset value of the underlying real estate, >leaving an American citizen in the unenviable position of having a net worth >lower than a Sub-Saharan African in the bush. This of course ignores the >almost $2 trillion in consumer credit which isn't backed by anthing, and >which WOULD already put us under water if it were included. Household financial assets were $90 trillion. That did not count real estate. >And we really don't even know yet how much trouble the "social security" >system is in. Actually, we do. But it is a sure thing that you don't, but will probably trot out some more obnoxium from your strange orifice about the subject. lojbab -- lojbab [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |