
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Al, Thanks for your response. I'm inclined to disagree with the extremely open definition of UUism for several reasons. Here is one in particular that comes to mind: Both Unitarians and Universalists showed the greatest periods of growth during times when they stood in distinct contrast to other religious bodies. As many mainline churches absorbed more liberal theologies, however, both Unitarianism and Universalism became less distinctive. Universalism, especially, was criticized for offering nothing more than a negative critique of a specific doctrine. If Unitarian Universalism is to be a sustaining, cradle-to-grave kind of faith, then I think UUs will have to first recognize that they are much less theologically diverse than they think they are and then recognize that their implicit theologies are not only distinctive, but worth sharing. Anyway, the poll results are in and, according to most people who responded, Unitarian Universalism is not a religion. More interesting, perhaps, are the many definitions of UUism offered by folks who didn't feel their view fit into the poll answers. You can read all the responses at http://matthewgatheringwater.blogspot.com -- soc.religion.unitarian-univ is a moderated newsgroup. Please mail messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and see http://sruu.iecc.com for the FAQ and posting policy.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |