
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Al" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > L&J Welch wrote: > > > > > "Al" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Marvin Edwards wrote: > >> > >> > " L&J Welch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> >> And reasonable people can disagree on the judgment. At one time it > >> >> was > >> > thought by some that the most good could be achieved by sacrificing > >> > children to the volcano,...or killing the goat,...or marrying our > >> > siblings,...or attacking Pearl Harbor,...or creating the holocaust. < > >> > > >> > Excellent point. Even a democratic people, such as the Germans during > >> > WWII, can be misled en masse down a path to genocide. > >> > >> Point of order, Mr Chairman! > >> > >> The above might lead one to conclude that Germany 1939-1945 was a > > democracy. > >> It wasn't, though the German people themselves were arguably democratic > > but > >> oppressed. > > > > History shows that Hitler was democratically elected. > > Urban legend, I'm afraid. > > AH became Chancellor in Jan 1933 because he was appointed to the post by > Hindenburg to whom he had narrowly lost the Presidency. Human rights were > suspended Feb 1933 following a fire at the Reichstag, and that suspension > was used to supress the Communists and others. At elections in Mar 1933, > the Nazis failed to obtain an outright majority and returned to power based > on a coalition with the DNVP. Dictatorial authority was obtained a few > weeks later with the 'Enabling Act'. Office of Chancellor and President > were merged on the death of Hindenburg the following year. > > So, history shows that Hitler was *not* democratically elected even by the > standards of the time, never mind the standards of ours. Wasn't he democratically elected by his party (NAZI) who then was the party who could form a government (as recognized by Hindenburg?). In that case could one not argue he was as democratically elected as Blair? > > Also, the United States was at no time "one vote short of choosing German as > the official language", another urban legend. I know you didn't say so, but > I thought I'd get it in! > > > He then created > > illusions of foreign and internal threats to assume more and more power > > until he was a dictator. > > Yup. > > > Reminds me of WMD and the Patriot Act. > > Et tu? Although there is some difficulty: a "war on terror" that is to last > for decades (so the rumor goes) is consistent with both these statements: > 1. There is nothing to fear because other democracies who have engaged on > multi-decade wars on terror (such as the UK, Israel) have avoided turning > into dictatorships; > 2. In newspeak, "War is peace" justifies dictatorship, ergo, there is > everything to fear from an administration that countenances effectively > perpetual warfare. > > These steps have been trodden before -- wisdom must be in identifying the > fork in the road before it must be done in hindsight. > -- > Al > -- > soc.religion.unitarian-univ is a moderated newsgroup. Please mail messages to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], and see http://sruu.iecc.com for the FAQ and posting policy. -- soc.religion.unitarian-univ is a moderated newsgroup. Please mail messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and see http://sruu.iecc.com for the FAQ and posting policy.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |