Re: How it all works 2

Thanks, Dan.  Interesting article, but it is much easier than he says.  

Just because someone says money cannot or should not be abolished does not
mean that it cannot be done, and be done  justly and well..

If you abolish money, it is easy to manage the world much much better than it is
being arranged now. - It will be simply supply of need, and that is simple
logistics.  God, at the moment it is nothing more than dog eat dog, and bury the
hindmost by the million.  We can do better than that.

And any who want to argue and abuse the systen - Well, as Leitner puts it,
"Hello, Chum. Come on, Pal - Into your cans." - And do it.

By the way, in response to the little article yesterday I received 62 viruses.
This morning I had received 49 by 9.00 a.m., and since then I have lost count,
but it must be 200 - 28 more have this moment arrived.  You see, they recognize
the accuracy and feasibility of what we're proposing.

And it's not hard to see who is sending them - These are the folks who manage
the viruses as their weapon, the same creatures who fill our children's email
boxes and TVs with pornography.  These are genuinely bad people who intend 
the rest of us in the ground.  Well, what's good for the goose . . .

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:42:51 GMT, "Dan Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>You might find this interesting.
>
>http://www.socialcredit.com/subpages_resources/environment.htm
>
>dp
>
>"Fred Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Those who read the litttle homily on 'How it all works', probably failed
>to see
>> the real joke of it all - a really ripe joke for some. - With such
>education as
>> they now oblige us to assimilate, it would be a surprise if the humour
>were
>> appreciated by any more than the handful who perpetrate it -
>>
>> That means of bribing all of our presidents and prime ministers and
>monarchs -
>> those famous 'loan guarantees' - are totally without cost and totally
>without
>> risk.  And the money they produce is a totall fiction.  It does not exist
>in
>> reality.   Sure, there are some bits of paper and metal, and whole rows of
>zeros
>> for them to show you, but they indicate only an illusion that from the
>> all-credulous innocence of infancy humans are persuaded to believe - that
>> 'money' has 'value'.
>>
>> The real 'value' of a thing is its usefulness.  It's 'monetary value' does
>not
>> exist except as a mirage in persuaded minds.  However, since this illusion
>> enables a few to enslave the rest, for them it has been a useful tool for
>the
>> last five thousand years, but this does not make it any more true or any
>less of
>> a strategic lie.
>>
>> The fact that these same few have screwed all our ancestors into their
>graves
>> for the last five thousand years to rinse them of the same fictional
>'value' via
>> their similarly venal 'leaders' means only that.  Our people were
>controlled and
>> lived in comparative misery and they died, but the money had no real
>value, for
>> all its effectiveness in elirminating the pawns.
>>
>> But it also means that eighty percent of the work done in the world is
>done
>> simply to produce the money to live - "Do you think food grows in the
>ground or
>> something?" - And it means that eighty percent of the energy used is used
>> unnecessarily, thus overheating the planet.
>>
>> In view of what we see done so blatantly before us today in controlling
>our
>> leaders and so controlling us, and of what is intended to be done in the
>> imminent future, don't you think it is time we took a break and took stock
>of
>> what is being done to us and  our world?
>>
>> Unless we do, I don't give the rest of us three hundred years before we
>will
>> have become as extinct as the other neanderthals. - Which is what is
>intended.
>>
>> There are many alternatives, and they are all better than what we have.
>It is
>> in our hands to devise them and produce them.  Though we are treated as
>sheep
>> and educated to be so, we are not sheep.
>>
>
>