
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
It would seem plausible to argue that women are the primary actors within the animal protection movement since they make up close to 80 % of the membership (Richards, 1990/1992; Jasper & Nelkin, 1992). Put differently, women have a pre-eminent standing and legitimacy in the movement that may eclipse that of their male colleagues. Yet, standing is not determined by sheer weight of numbers alone. Women always have constituted the army of grassroots activists in the animal movement-the handmaidens or “midwives” to the movement (Jasper & Nelkin, 1992, p. 90). Ironically, however, male philosophers, notably Tom Regan and Peter Singer, have predominated as the leading advocates of animal rights.
Much of the literature contains an implicit assumption that women and men vary fundamentally in the way they treat other life forms [Little Mary Weeper just said it herself!]. There is ample empirical evidence in every context where humans use or abuse animals. It is evident that men, more than women, work or otherwise engage in animal-oriented occupations and leisure activities-in factory farms, abattoirs, science and veterinary practice, hunting, shooting, trapping and fishing, rodeos, horse and dog racing, and a host of similar pursuits.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |