Re: Russia worried about loss of Russian language in former USSR republics

Egor Bolonev wrote:
> Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj wrote:
>
> > Egor Bolonev wrote:
> >
> > > yp11 wrote:
> >
> >
> >  >> I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > > > Well I hadn't really expected them to defend  it.
> > > > > They probably fully agree with the spirit and see nothing in it 
> > > > > that needs defending. :(. That is my reading of their psyche.
> > > > > But anyway, what does it have to do with democracy or a democratic
> > > > > society?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > .................................
> > > > In fact the EU documents are presently being translated in some 15 
> > > > languages
> > > > and this will soon increase with the addition of new members.
> > > > That is what I meant by "democratic society". 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > EU has much more langs, and it's impossible to support all of 
> > > them(max 3).
> > > Ukraine has many russian citizens, so it's a good idea to support them.
> > Yuri wrote that the EU documents are being translated into 15
> > languages. But you claim this is impossible ?
>
>
> It's absolutely imposible. They claim, but they do not. There are a problem
> languages, f.e. finnish. There is a big lack of -finnish- translators. 
> When they increase language number, there will be a "catastrophe" - 
> technical or "democracy" or both of them.
>
> > Why are there so many russian citizens in Ukraine?
>
>
> ÐÐÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÐÐÐÑÑÑ ÑÐÐÐÐ citizens? How about 
> people-who-do-not-speak-ukraiane,
> f.e. - prezident-of-ukraine-who-speak-some-mixturelang.
>
> > *Pochemu tak mnogo russkih grazhdaninov v Ukraini? *
> > Do russians in the USA stay russian citizens?
> > Why is it a good idea to support russian citizens in Ukraine ?
>
>
> It's gainfully.
I mean, Russia have need of emigrants, and Ukraine is the best donor.