
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:33:48 GMT, Snoopy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s> wrote: >Amit wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> >>>In soc.culture.british Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>When a babu does the work of a firangee >>>>>>>he should be payed the same amount. >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>Provided they are being payed in same currency and in same location. >>>>> >>>>>So you don't mind if British Army doesn't pay Gurkha >>>>>same pension as British soldier? Good. >>>> >>>>it shows your week comprihension ability >>>>I said " PAY SHOULD BE SAME FOR SAME WORK AT SAME LOCATION" >>>>Gurkha Soldiers and british soldiers work in same units in same >>>>location so >>> >>>(sigh) Pension is for retirement. Gurkhas retire in Nepal >>>and Brits retire in Britain. >> >> (Sigh) week mind with week comprihension . british Army is recruiting >> Gorkhas >> it is up to them where they are deployed and what tasks are assigned. >> There is a basic difference beteen a soldier and a mercinery. >> Untill and unless brish army is outsourcing its operations to some >> nepalese >> outfits there is no reson why they should be paying Gorkhas less. > >Why are Indians working at Indian embassies and consulates in western >countries paid so much less than the locals? For example, a receptionist >in Manhattan might make $30k or more in a job at a large health club, >but the receptionist at the Indian consulate probably makes no more than >$12k. > >Btw. where did you go to school in India, and what was the name of the >school? I'm just curious. I hope you are not insinuating that British Foreign Services Personnel get the same pay as their American counter-parts?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |