Re: Go to: http://bschwarz.0catch.com

"Barbara Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Markasurusio Probertasaurusio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > "Barbara Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > "Markasurusio Probertasaurusio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in
> >  message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > "Barbara Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > mimus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > > On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 21:56:37 GMT, "Markasurusi
usProbertasaurusius"
> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >"Byron Canfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > A hundred percent sure is that David Touretzky and his friends are
NO,
> > > > > I repeat NO, freedom-of-speech-activists. They are fans of the
First
> > > > > Amendment ONLY when it is about their own speech, their crap they
say
> > > > > and write about others. But when you are critical of them, and if
you
> > > > > have the guts to speak out against them and put a website up with
> > > > > critic about them, you are in a surprise of a life time: No free
> > > > > speech for you, no right to put a website up, but instead
campaigns to
> > > > > bar you from everything that they take for granted.
> > > >
> > > > Can you prove your allegegations wrt Touretsky trying to stifle your
> >  freedom
> > > > of speech? Or, is it just his efforts to end your slander?
> > > >
> > > > Balance of ravings deleted!
> > >
> > >
> > > Duh, my website critical of Touretzky is gone. Who was it except
> > > Touretzky and his buddies?
> >
> > So, you have no actual proof. Perhaps your ISP or host decided that your
> > slander was going to cost them a bundle in legal fees.
> >
> > > Clear the difference between slander and libel, Saurus. You posting
> > > that I slandered (or libeled) anybody is libel on your part!
> >
> > Nope. It is expression of my opinion. Opinions cannot be slanderous.
>
>
> Once again, you have not cleared the difference between libel and
> slander.
>
> You are glib and uneducated.
>
> You made a factual statement by lying that I slandered somebody. That
> is no opinion under the law. Study the defamation laws before you make
> more a fool out of yourself, Saurus, and before it is you who has to
> save to pay the legal bills.

One of the key elements of any action for defamation is that "2 : to harm
the reputation of by libel or slander." IOW, you first need to have a
reputation that is not subject to criticism.

>From my reading of those who post in response to you, and IMNSHO, your
reputation needs work.

Now, back to Touretsky. You claim he is a sexual pervert. You based this on
a sales receipt from a seually oriented website.

Firstly, I question how you got your hands on this. Seems tome that there
may have been an invasion of his privacy.

Secondly, from the sales receipt it is impossible to tell what his sexual
activities are. Thus, by calling him a sexual pervert based solely on this
"evidence" is far fetched to say the least. Thus, AFAIAC, your claim that he
is a 'sexual pervert' is not based in fact, and, thus, an outright
falsehood.

AFAIK, this is slanderous.