
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Barbara Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > > "Barbara Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > WARNING > > > > > > > > (Garbage deleted) > > > > > > > > Ever hear of the freedom of speech? > > > > > > > > Everything on that site is publically available. > > > > > > > > Have a good day. > > > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > Jeff, there are limitations to freedom of speech. Sexual harassment is > > > no freedom of speech, and telling people how to make bombs is no > > > freedom of speech either, because people may have to die as a result > > > of that information. > > > > > > This earth is not a sane place. Even if you put a little note > > > underneath your bomb instructions and information about how to throw > > > bombs in police cars, that people should not do that, Dave Touretzky, > > > you, and anybody else knows that there are numerous people who just > > > want to blow up others and they screw the law and warnings. Touretzky > > > claims no responsibilty for what other crazy people construct and > > > build after the instructions on his website, but he tells them how to > > > do that. What a dangerous snake! > > > > > > Only because there are also other criminals out there who tell > > > terrorists on the web how to blow up things and people, doesn't mean > > > for Touretzky, a university educator (!) to act same reckless. > > > > > > I also remind you that the young man who had the same bomb > > > instructions on his website was arrested by the FBI. His website was > > > removed. What do you think makes Touretzky innocent by putting that > > > dangerous stuff back on his site? > > > > > > There are millions of example in which Touretzky could make his point > > > on freedom of speech. Endangering other peoples'lives and degrading > > > others through sexual perversions, persecuting religion, are the worst > > > examples! > > > > > > Anyway, Jeff, if you, or anybody you love will be disabled or killed > > > through a bomb that was build after Touretzky's or another madman's > > > instructions, you will be a changed man. You will regret your words > > > that freedom of speech should allow detailed information on how to > > > build and throw bombs. The world is too crazy for that information, > > > how come you have not noticed that? > > > > > > The right to live unharmed is a constituional right that is superior > > > to freedom of speech. If freedom of speech harms or endangers the > > > constitutional right of people to live a peaceful and happy life, you > > > can't say it. It would be unconstitutional. Touretzky's bomb > > > instructions are unconstitutional because he endangers other > > > constitutional rights. His persecution of religion also violates the > > > First Amendment. > > > > > > Barbara Schwarz > > > > Barbara, I agree with your concern. I think that freedom of speech can > > go a little too far. If "Freedom of Speach" allows people to promote > > criminal behavior, easily accessed to ALL ages, then there is > > something terribly wrong with our society. And people actually > > allowing it, and standing up for it is sickening to me. We have been > > fighting to keep terrorists out of our country, while our own citizens > > are standing up for people who have no respect for human life, and > > glorify the terror. > > > > It is sad how people can be so dillusional. > > > > -Gerome > > I am glad that you are responsbile, Gerome. My point exactly. The > world is a very dangerous place and while most people will not resort > to brutal violence, there are still enough people that do. > > Actually, I think freedom of speech is very important, but building > bombs is not. It is really rotten to abuse the First Amendment to > promote terrorism and crimes. > > Our police reported that 500 bombs exploded in Salt Lake Valley during > the last summer. They said the bombs were constructed by teenagers who > downloaded bomb instructions from the Internet. As far as I know, only > animals were killed and property was blown up, but just imagine what > may happen if a person accidentially walks in the way of a bomb. > > And then there are terrorists that don't want to blow up only animals > (which is pretty gruesome too) and property, but aim their violence > towards innocent people. > > The earth doesn't need more websites to build bombs. It needs more > websites to build a better and saver world. And esp. an educator, as > David Touretzky, should know about it. He is giving "free speech" a > bad rap. Ther Kriminal Kult of $cientology gives pseudo-religions a bad rap.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |