Re: Abuse complaints filed with Geocities, Yahoo! & Excite: Barbara Schwarz

"Andrew Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Dicktop_Stud wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> <snip>

Alright, Andrew, I noticed now that Scarff mailed you an envelope. My
mouse has a malfunction, and I was unable to roll all of your e-mail
down. I changed now to another computer. Must have been a Touretzky
mouse. (Joke!)

So, what does it prove? That Touretzky did not send the invoice and
the porn attachments himself? If he mailed it not only to me, but also
to others, it would just mean that he is even worse of a sexual
harasser if he would have just sexually harassed me with it.

Touretzky was the only one who had the original invoice. The store
would not pull such a thing as they don't want to lose customers.

I think there was never a campaign. What a lousy campaign was that?
Perhaps Claire Swazey received the envelope too, but that just makes
Scarff, Fluffy and me?

And who would do sexually harass people who have nothing in common?
Scarff can't be sexually harassed because he is one of the worst
sexual harasser there is. Fluffy said she did not feel harassed, but I
did. Once more, I was the target, Touretzky just mailed it out to some
more, to make stupid people believe it wasn't him.

I worked for many years in the Guardian Office and later OSA. We did
not work with such tricks, nobody around me conducted any criminal
activities. I don't hold my hand in the fire for the Scientology
infiltrators, after all, Garry Scarff claimed once to be a
Scientologist and had infiltrated OSA. In my opinion, he is capable
for anything.

If Scientologists would have targeted Touretzky, from whom would they
have received the envelope? The store mailed it only to their
customer, which is Touretzky. And why would they mail it to me and not
their many VIPs? If Kelly Preston, Catherine Bell, Anne Archer, Julia
Migenes, or any other famous female Scientologist would have received
that porn letter, it would be not just discussed in the newsgroups, it
would be national news. They would have handed the matter to their
press office and their PR employees would have told the media what a
person Touretzky is.

Anyway, Touretzky mailed him a copy of the letter, so that he can do
damage control, in case I should go public with it.

The question is not how many of such letter he mailed also to others,
the question is what Touretzky did on August 5 and 6, 2003 and where
he was.

Touretzky has porn pictures on his website, for each little kid to
see. Those people on the porn pictures use porn articles, which came
from a sex store. An
"educator", who is not ashamed to put such picture on his website, is
also not ashamed to sexually harass others with a porn letter and draw
attention towards him.

Even in case he did not mail the enevelope himself, (which I do not
believe at all) the issue is that Touretzky is a perverted person; he
is above the law, the sexually harasses with his website; he has no
respect of rights of women (see his link to the Katy Johnson
defamatory article); he is dangerous because he shows children and
others how to become terrorists by constructing bombs; he is
anti-education, by attacking the L. Ron Hubbard study technology, who
really works, and he is anti-religious. He is persecuting the religion
Scientology, but not pointing towards the finger to Scientology
infiltrators, as Scarff, but rather working with them or through them.

Barbara Schwarz       



> 
> >> He did not receive the Touretzky porn letter with the mail.
> >
> > I sent the letter to Andrew Robertson in New Zealand to post to ABS.
> > He emailed me yesterday confirming his receipt of the letter.
> 
> This is correct.  I wrote to Garry yesterday and explained to him why I
> hadn't posted the contents of the letter to alt.binaries.scientology:
> 
> ............................................................................
> 
> Hi Garry
> 
> Sorry for the delay in letting you know that I received the letter you
> sent me.  It took nearly four weeks to arrive, and at that time I
> thought Barbara had moved on to other exotic ideas and it would be
> prudent not to post the scans and resurrect the controversy.
> 
> Your letter was correctly addressed, marked 'Airmail' with the right
> postage, and postmarked '16 August', the day you said you sent it.  It
> arrived on Mon 15 Sep.  It should have taken 4 to 6 days.  The only clue
> is that the machine printed sorting code on the bottom right of the
> envelope had been erased by a black marker pen.  I don't know if this
> code is entered manually, or by OCR equipment, but I can only assume the
> letter went somewhere else first and was eventually hand sorted.
> 
> My scanner is refusing to work at present and the nearest friend with a
> scanner is 20 miles north, so I have two options.  See if the Wellington
> Public Library has a scanner for general use, or find a copy shop who
> could scan it for me.  No doubt I'd get some young woman who would look
> at me very strangely and wonder why I wanted pictures of dildos scanned!
> 
> [...]
> ............................................................................
> 
> The envelope was addressed to:
> 
>        Garry Scarff
> 7760 Hollywood Blvd.
>     Apartment #206
> Los Angeles CA 90046
> 
> (centre justified)
> 
> The typewriter or printer used was either of poor quality or the ink was
> nearly exhausted.
> 
> The sorting code at the bottom reads:
> 
> 90046+265i    11i1ii11iii11iiii1ii1i11iiii1i1i111111i1iiii11i1i1i1ii1ii1ii11
> 
> (I've used '1' to represent a tall vertical bar, and 'i' to represent a
> short one.
> 
> The postmark reads from the top:
> 
> 2 NO VA 220
>       PM
>   06 AUG
>     2003
> 
> There are two 37 cent stamps with a picture of the American flag, and the
> franking says:
> 
>               SPIRIT
> THAT MOVES AMERICA
> 
> There is no return address on the envelope which is white, and measures
> 240mm x 100 mm.
> 
> The contents are:
> 
> 1)  An invoice dated 12/05/02 number 125888A addressed to David Touretzky
> with details of three items.
> 
> 2)  A picture of three dildos of various sizes from Compact to Luxury.
> 
> 3)  A picture of six dildos of various sizes from Large to Small.
> 
> All three sheets have been copied on sub-standard equipment, probably a FAX
> machine.
> 
> Andrew