
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Ron Hammon wrote on Mon, 06 Oct 2003 09:41:55 -0700: > Nori Otaku wrote: >> > snip > >> However, if we're still "presuming" it is both safe and wise to consider >> that you may be incorrect - since your position is based solely on the >> lack of contrary evidence. >> >> > "Lack of contrary evidence"?! There you go again. Do you have any > "contrary evidence" to the existence of Zeus? If not, "you may be > incorrect" to dismiss the concept? As I said, you aren't very pragmatic, > are you? Do you really want to live in a mushy world where EVERY > wild-assed fantasy is elevated to a potential truth? Yes. Probability is not an exact science, and it is *difficult* to distinguish between truth and fiction; it is also frequently a subjective decision, and should remain so. > (Nori in a Bullwinkle voice: "Well, we will never really know if there > are fairies in the garden, or not." What a crock.) -- NoriOtaku :: Change 'spam' to 'com' to send mail
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |