
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], brachypodium at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 7/10/03 9:44 am: > in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher Robin at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 6/10/03 9:00 pm: > >> >> "brachypodium" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> From: "Christopher Robin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online -- Northeast Ohio >>>> Newsgroups: >>>> >> alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.sci.phenomena.unusual,sci.psycholo >> gy >>>> .personality,sci.techniques.testing.misc >>>> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:25:51 GMT >>>> Subject: Re: Transubstantiation Error >>>> >>>> >>>> "brachypodium" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cunneen) >>>>>> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com >>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic >>>>>> Date: 05 Oct 2003 08:44:04 GMT >>>>>> Subject: Re: Transubstantiation Error >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> What evidence is there that bread and wine are God, here, today? It >> is >>>>>>> insufficient to take 'God's word' for it, unless His words can be >> shown >>>> to >>>>>>> mean without doubt that bread and wine are God, or can be God. That >> has >>>>>>> never been done. So what practical tests can be applied to show that >>>> bread >>>>>>> and wine are, or can be, God? Suggestions are invited from any, but >> in >>>>>>> particular from accredited behavioural scientists, psychologists and >>>> workers >>>>>>> in related fields. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jesus' own words,< >>>>> >>>>> Jesus did not make any statement that supports transubstantiation. >>>> Luke 22:19, Matthew 26:26, John 6:32-66, 1 Cor 10:16, 1 Cor 11:23-27< >>> >>> You must be aware that I am aware of these verses; so I wonder why you >>> merely referenced them. >>> >> I'm not sure you're aware of them at all, since you made that statement. >> Perhaps you meant that your interpretation of what Jesus said doesn't >> support Transubstantiation? You claimed he made no statement that supports >> Transubstantiation, I gave you 3 places in the Gospels, as well as 2 in >> Paul's writings that appear to disagree with you.< > > If you knew that they only appear to disagree, it was ingenuous of you< Erratum: that should be 'disingenuous'. Peter
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |