Re: Transubstantiation Error

> From: "Christopher Robin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online -- Northeast Ohio
> Newsgroups: 
> alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.sci.phenomena.unusual,sci.psychology
> .personality,sci.techniques.testing.misc
> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:25:51 GMT
> Subject: Re: Transubstantiation Error
> 
> 
> "brachypodium" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cunneen)
>>> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
>>> Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
>>> Date: 05 Oct 2003 08:44:04 GMT
>>> Subject: Re: Transubstantiation Error
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> What evidence is there that bread and wine are God, here, today? It is
>>>> insufficient to take 'God's word' for it, unless His words can be shown
> to
>>>> mean without doubt that bread and wine are God, or can be God. That has
>>>> never been done. So what practical tests can be applied to show that
> bread
>>>> and wine are, or can be, God? Suggestions are invited from any, but in
>>>> particular from accredited behavioural scientists, psychologists and
> workers
>>>> in related fields.
>>>> 
>>>> Peter
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jesus' own words,<
>> 
>> Jesus did not make any statement that supports transubstantiation.
> Luke 22:19, Matthew 26:26, John 6:32-66, 1 Cor 10:16, 1 Cor 11:23-27<

You must be aware that I am aware of these verses; so I wonder why you
merely referenced them.

Peter