Re: Transubstantiation Error

"brachypodium" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cunneen)
> > Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
> > Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
> > Date: 05 Oct 2003 08:44:04 GMT
> > Subject: Re: Transubstantiation Error
> >
> >
> >> What evidence is there that bread and wine are God, here, today? It is
> >> insufficient to take 'God's word' for it, unless His words can be shown
to
> >> mean without doubt that bread and wine are God, or can be God. That has
> >> never been done. So what practical tests can be applied to show that
bread
> >> and wine are, or can be, God? Suggestions are invited from any, but in
> >> particular from accredited behavioural scientists, psychologists and
workers
> >> in related fields.
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >
> > Jesus' own words,<
>
> Jesus did not make any statement that supports transubstantiation.
Luke 22:19, Matthew 26:26, John 6:32-66, 1 Cor 10:16, 1 Cor 11:23-27

Nice try...

> Some believe that there is good evidence that Jesus actually denied
transubstantiation.
>
And others believe that there is good evidence that Jesus actually taught
transsubstantiation.  See above mentioned verses.


> >the continual tradition of all the Ancient Churches,<
>
> It cannot be shown to be continual if it is not mentioned in Scripture,
> which it is not; it is therefore almost certain to be a novelty, rather
than a tradition.

Actually, it is mentioned in Scripture... see above mentioned Scripture.