
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
For a fuller discussion of retardation measurements, see http://www.olympusmicro.com/primer/lightandcolor/birefringenceintro.html Also, my reference to a Michelson-Levy chart is wrong. It is a Michael-Levy chart. sorry for the error.. Aaron On 1 Dec 2003 08:01:50 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tzavalas) wrote: >Hello everybody, i´m spiros from greece. > >I´m taking a course on polymer science and recently I heard that the >non-isotropic substances are not bound to have the same rerfactive >index on all directions. So in the most general case every a sample >bears 2 vertical and one parallel reflactive index. The parallel or >vertical dirctions are regarded in relation to an axis of orientation >of specific groups, like liquid crystals, polymer chains, fibres or >even bonds between atoms etc(which are in the sample and whose >"preference" for a direction is what causes the sample to be >"non-isotropic.") > >So in my case, where I have a stretched polymer film, I guess the >same thing is taking place. I know that I can use a polarizing >microscope to calculate the values of the refractive index as the >incident (planar-polarized) on the sample light rotates. > >BUT I DONT KNOW HOW????????????? > >thanks in advance, spiros tzavalas.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |