
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Kusmierek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I would appreciate your advice on statistical design. >There are four subjects, each was tested with 171 stimuli. Each >stimulus is described by 22 parameters. A test yields a single >numerical outcome. I am interested whether the parameters of stimuli >influenced test results. >One idea is to average the subjects' test results for each stimulus >and calculate partial correlation coefficients between the average >test result and the 22 parameters. However, this approach offers no >view into the intersubject variability. >Another idea is to categorize the stimuli according to each >parameter's value: e.g. >=median vs. <median. Then I would check >whether test results obtained with stimuli which have high (>=median) >parameter values differ from test results obtained with stimuli which >have low (<median) values. >I was thinking of a 23-factor ANOVA, with one repeated mesures factor >(subject) and 22 factors=parameters. In the design, only main factors >and interactions (subject x a_parameter) would be analyzed. >In such way, I would get a measure of whether any of the parameters >influences the test result (high Fs for 22 factors-parameters) and a >measure of across-subjets consistency of this influence (low Fs for >subject x parameter). I suggest instead you do a quantitative analysis. A 23 parameter ANOVA requires two many trials. -- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |