
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Shannon) wrote in message > > 2STO typically uses 1/3 the propellant for a given payload, although vehicle empty > > weights are higher.< > > I don't have a problem with 2STO for a RLV. But how do you get the > first stage back? If you have good mass ratio between the 1st and 2nd > stage, its likley to be going fast at the seperation point making it > quite hard to do. I suspect the TSTO can glide back. Even at mach 8 separations, is the first stage all that far down range, more than 100-200 miles? It'll have a lot of energy from altitude and speed that can be spent turning around and gliding back. However, despite my ill-edumucated suspicions, I do note many early US shuttle concepts seemed to favor lots of jet engines. The "winged Saturn", the Saturn V flyback first stage, had 10 jet engines. Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |