
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:58:46 GMT, A Hubble Hubble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> STS-26, 27, 29, 30, 28, 34, 33, 32, 36, 31... all those *before* the >> big hydrogen leak fiasco hit in 1990. >> >> Since those STS-numbers were approved by NASA officials at the very >> top, this should serve as a warning not to give too much credence to >> early return-to-flight launch schedules. >> >> In other words, bank on the FAWG at your own peril. >> >> Brian > >Since this is an HST thread, I was specifically talking about SM-4's >relative placement in the manifest. Well, of the above numbers, 31 was the Hubble deploy mission. At one time post-Challenger it was obviously considered the sixth mission after Return-To-Flight. Look where it ended up. I fully expect to see SM-4 scheduled for a time when all three Orbiters are online, regardless of the Station assembly sequence. Brian
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |