
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Leaf Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Unfortunately many things changed after February 1. Even the official > position of the astronaut office at JSC is that astronaut lives will > not be risked for an HST retrieval mission, i.e. the benefit of > returning HST to Earth is not worth the risko of astronaut lives. The > risk is acceptable for servicing missions where the benefit is > scientific knowledge. > > The HST Program did a study to determine what would have to be done to > bring HST back to in the payload bay and while the study assumed > Columbia, i.e. no external airlock, a return mission could be > performed with an orbiter that has the external airlock, although > additional work would have to be done (servicing hardware mods for HST > to fit farther back in the bay). > > The current thinking is that some sort of propulsion module will be > attached to HST to provide a controlled re-entry at the end of HST's > life. > > Craig Fink wrote: > Interesting its not worth the RISK OF LIFE to bring it back but it is worth the RISK OF LIFE to attach a rocket to it to up burn it up in the atmosphere. I wonder if anybody has done some sort of environmental study about the tradeoffs since the mission itself and the rocket attached will add more pollution to the air. Maybe the need to destroy is to destroy any evidence of other errors and short cuts taken by managers and those that built it. Maybe they want to make dam sure it burns up even at the RISK OF LIFE to those on the mission to destroy it so it can't be used as evidence. Just a thought but it does kind of go along with the thinking that one must not do anything that can leave physical evidence to point to management and there friends. David A. Scott -- My Crypto code http://cryptography.org/cgi-bin/crypto.cgi/Misc/scott19u.zip http://cryptography.org/cgi-bin/crypto.cgi/Misc/scott16u.zip http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip old version My Compression code http://bijective.dogma.net/ **TO EMAIL ME drop the roman "five" ** Disclaimer:I am in no way responsible for any of the statements made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged. As a famous person once said "any cryptograhic system is only as strong as its weakest link"
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |