
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Allen Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So when the US uses its bizarrely overbroad but written-down-in- >law definition, it gets a pass. Not even the US has claimed that its bizarre definition has any standing in international law. That's strictly a tool of domestic repression, and should not be brought up in a discussion of treaties. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |