
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henry Spencer) wrote: >A new aircraft design is test-flown many times, systematically exploring >the flight envelope (to significantly beyond normal operational limits) >and debugging the individual flight vehicles, before it carries its first >real payload. Ground testing and simulation are considered useful >supplements to this, but not a substitute for it. On the other hand, a new submarine usually goes right for the limit of it's envelope within the first few weeks of testing. Why exactly must rockets follow the aviation model when they aren't aircraft? D. -- The STS-107 Columbia Loss FAQ can be found at the following URLs: Text-Only Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq.html Enhanced HTML Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html Corrections, comments, and additions should be e-mailed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as well as posted to sci.space.history and sci.space.shuttle for discussion.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |