
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allen Thomson) wrote: >BTW, this reminds me that CATS is only part of the manned spaceflight >story. What we really need is SCATS -- Safe and Cheap Access To Space. >At present the "C" is two or three orders of magnitude from where it >should be, and I suspect the same is true of "S." No. One could design a system limited to 1000kg payloads, at a cost of $10/kg, and you'd qualify for CATS. You wouldn't however have a very useful system. D. -- The STS-107 Columbia Loss FAQ can be found at the following URLs: Text-Only Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq.html Enhanced HTML Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html Corrections, comments, and additions should be e-mailed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as well as posted to sci.space.history and sci.space.shuttle for discussion.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |