
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Hop David wrote: > > Scott Lowther wrote: > > Henry Spencer wrote: > > > > > >>>>...the two structures weren't at all similar. Notably, in > >>>>Europe, the nobility had ties to the peasants as well as vice-versa. > >>> > >>>What, like the Czar and the serfs? Yeah, that was WAAAAAAAAY different > >> > >>>from the master and slave relationship in the CSA... > >> > >>Actually, it was; read a bit more history, Scott. Even slavery -- and > >>yes, serfdom in Russia was pretty much slavery -- isn't as simple and > >>standardized and unidirectional a thing as you seem to think. Slavery in > >>the CSA was fairly extreme, not a typical example. > > > > > > Irrelevant to the discussion. You said: "It's not like slavery was > > something only the US thought of. They were just a bit slower to get > > rid of it than most of the rest of the world." You just admitted that > ^^^^ > > > "yes, serfdom in Russia was pretty much slavery." So tell me... which > > came first, 1865 or 1917? > > 1865. But since "most" instead of "all" was used this is a non-rebuttal. Actually, it is. Henry considers conscription to be slavery, so it's STILL going on in his view. And sicne the US has not had the draft since, what, the early/mid 70's, while it's commonplace elsewhere... again, the United States is leading the way in the world. -- Scott Lowther, Engineer Remove the obvious (capitalized) anti-spam gibberish from the reply-to e-mail address
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |