
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Lowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There was very little European about the way the CSA worked, if you look >> closely; the resemblance was superficial. > >But still far closer to the Euros than the northern USA. Much closer in substance to the northern USA, actually -- anathema though the thought was to Southerners -- although some of the appearances were closer to Europe. >> ...the two structures weren't at all similar. Notably, in >> Europe, the nobility had ties to the peasants as well as vice-versa. > >What, like the Czar and the serfs? Yeah, that was WAAAAAAAAY different >from the master and slave relationship in the CSA... Actually, it was; read a bit more history, Scott. Even slavery -- and yes, serfdom in Russia was pretty much slavery -- isn't as simple and standardized and unidirectional a thing as you seem to think. Slavery in the CSA was fairly extreme, not a typical example. And the discussion was about Western Europe, specifically Britain, since we were talking about why European nations considered intervening in the war and why they didn't do it. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |