
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
For your definition. People who like to blame W for everything and heap praise on Clinton for everything. People who have no rational basis for causality but instead incessantly spout nonsense about correlations. "R. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > JBO wrote: > > > > Growth was better. > > > > http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=71000001&refer=home&sid=aXuXEm5y10Uo > > > > Hmmmmmmmm for all your overdeterminists out there > > If 7.2 was unsustainable (as it was reported), 8.2 is more so. That > is an impressive quarter, but just a fluctuation around whatever the > longer term trend is, IMO In fact, if the GDP suffers from the kind > of behavior that stock markets do, as presented in _Why Stock Markets > Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems_ by Didier > Sornette, I'm not sure I'm comforted by large, high frequency > fluctuations. And as the URL you gave states, "Consumer spending > increased at a 6.4 percent annual rate last quarter, the fastest > pace in six years, and retailers such as Williams-Sonoma Inc. > restocked shelves to help satisfy anticipated sales." Consumers > as a group are in debt up to their chins, IMO, and these types > of increases in consumer spending can't be maintained indefinitely > either. But what do I know, I'm not an economist. ;-) > > Regards, > Russell > > P.S. What's an "overdeterminist"?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |