
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In sci.psychology article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: A lot of updating of Freudian theory has been going on over the last : couple of decades, especially in France, (Lacan and Derrida) but now : expanded heavily into the US.
Hate to tell you this, but psychoanalysis is not updating anything. It is a non-empirical field of thought. Not one fact can shake it from its desired interpretation. And, as with most hermeneutic endeavors, displays more information about hte analyst than the analysand.
Sure, there are many schools. This isn't advancement in the scientific sense where data literally kill an idea and a new, more fitting theory is developed. This branching is much more like the schisms of a religion, another data free zone of thought where tests of ideas is particularly irrelevant.
Read Crews & Webster for starters. Come back when you know a thing or two about the history of psychology which, by all reasonable accounts, doesn't include psychoanalysis save for its impact on psychiatry.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |