
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"John M Price PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In sci.psychology.psychotherapy article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> J. Wyatt Ehrenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : I am not a sociologist. I don't believe I misled anyone into > : thinking I was a sociologist. Perhaps my keen interest in the > : sociological properties of the educational system. > > Perhaps. My bad. It was from memory of some discussions on the clinical > list. > > Perhaps it is my > : incorporation of Darwinian theory into my critique. > > A sociologist would not have done that, or would have done that as poorly > as Gene Douglas did in this thread. Too bad you didn't offer your own critique, rather than just a generic labeling. > > Once again, so long spp. Too bad again, as I don't read anything on sppm but one or two posts, sometimes none for weeks, and my own posts don't show up. > > -- > John M. Price, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP! > Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion. > Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683 > > I see psychoanalysis as a contractual conversation about a person's > problems and how to resolve them. I tried to avoid the idea, which seemed > to be particularly pernicious, that the therapist knows more about the > patient than the patient himself. That seems to me so offensive. How can > you know more about a person after seeing him a few hours, a few days, or > even a few months, than he knows about himself? He has known himself a lot > longer! > - Thomas Szasz
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |