Re: From Author of Universal Inventory/Test Scorer

Mark Morin:  A g a i n !!!!!!!!! (with bonus material added)

AGAIN (as in another newsgroup AND BEFORE HERE):
Does not vary, huh????  WRONG, Mark.  Psychopath, liar!!!
Mark Morin:  Look at the signed copy of Brad's public key on
his mypubKey2.htm web page and look at the stuff in the signature
bracketing lines on his program code and look at the signature bracketing
lines on his recent sci.psychology.* posts and see if they are the same.

They are not.  On the mypubKey2.htm page the bracketing lines are

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPGasJr5mfd8AI17qEQLJ1ACfS6ihx4592mCzontlpriU1E/yjnQAnjl0
+ZL/fZzun419hbXkQ8U2MkSy
=o6PH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


On his posting of the program code (see Brad's forPost.htm page)
the bracketing lines are:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBP4tlv75mfd8AI17qEQLZGwCgkQY3S8mM1m3EGIb8wLw1zk0KfbUAn2cW
0Izo3SIB7j+KsHu6dStZShQt
=ruhs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

AND on Brad's recent newsgroup post, the bracketing lines were:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBP6lUML5mfd8AI17qEQL3fACgth9j9TarOUQCIB0ZSfHgeeDe490AoNki
kgCmVcRYtvrOGnnvv12lsT6j
=I1zB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

THESE ARE ALL THREE DIFFERENT, ***BUT VALID SIGNATURES FOR THE TEXT
CONTENT CONTAINED IN EACH***!!!!!

AND: In no meaningful sense is the digital key invalid.
The digital signing key has no expiration date. The public key to verify
the signer is in the major databases.  You can see who is the declared signer
_and_ you can see Brad sign with it.
It takes a special password to do the signing and ONLY the owner will have it.
Brad has it or he could not sign.  What more can you want?  Okay, I can imagine
one more thing:

Perhaps you would like to provide some official piece of text, see Brad sign
it and post it on his web site and then verify he indeed signed with the key
he said.  (The equivalent of this has really already been done!! -- with the signing
of the code of the program itself.  Do you really think some "true owner" of the
digital key signed Brad's code and Brad stole the signed code back from him plus
has had a signed copy of the public key on his site for over a year??  What are
the odds 1000000000 to 1 in Vegas !!!!)